Währungsreform.
You can find videos, info, news and photos about Währungsreform..
Google News (news about Währungsreform.)
Youtube (videos about Währungsreform.)
We all know McCain has sold his soul to win. Big mistake: the Democrats are taking the GOP bait, especially on Palin. She is the ultimate distraction. If we're not careful she'll be the final distraction. The perfect new celebrity -- Sarah Barracuda -- to capture the message in the 24-hour spin orgy, all the while attacking Obama as an elite celebrity. Any narrative that focuses on her -- any -- is a win for Republicans, carrying an undercurrent of race wars, gender wars, class wars. All ending with a debate on God and a return visit to Rev. Wright. Palin is a gateway drug to a back-alley brawl...with sass and sex. Wonderful.Watch McCain repeat "maverick" 300 times a day, like a mantra, 'til Election Day. Republicans and hockey moms against corruption and Lear jets. Orwell for second graders: distraction and chaos, phony scandals and bullshit patriotics from the crew that would install an inexperienced neophyte -- not even put through the crucible of the national stage -- a heartbeat away from the greatest nuclear arsenal the world has ever known, and not blink. Darkest reptilian politics that speak to the ultimate calcified cynicism of Republicans.Democrats need to...keep the focus relentlessly on the disastrous results of Bush/McCain/Republican rule. They need to remind voters of the disasters of the last seven-plus years. Specifically. And as people have been saying, we need to be mad as well as inspired. But John McCain is the Republican Party as much as Bush -- we need to be constantly reminded of the policies (and, yes, the crimes) that are threatening this country from within...war profiteering, taxpayer-funded mercenary armies and privatizing core functions of state, habeas corpus and warrantless wiretapping and presidential signing statements, and Katrina and justice department politicization, and phony intel and Abu Ghraib, rendition and torture.If the Democratic leadership wants to disregard its base and continue to disregard the rule of law, they deserve to lose...and will. Let's hope the Obama campaign doesn't come to this conclusion 10 days out. He needs to articulate his vision of the future, but he also needs to articulate a version of reality. The fiercest urgency is needed now.But some other fundamentals seem to be lost in the frenzy. McCain is no maverick, but it is worth understanding why the rabid right wing is cheering his call for government "reform" and to change "how government works at every level."McCain won't just be more of the same -- it will be worse than Bush-Cheney -- using the disasters of the past eight years and the actual crises we face to double down on the American Enterprise/Heritage Foundation vision of government that desires, as Grover Norquist said, to shrink government until "we can drown it in a bathtub."Now, no one in their right mind -- including reasonable independents and Republicans -- wants to double down on neocon ideology, but here comes the "maverick" and his economic advisers to use the crises we face to implement more "change" and "reform" to the system by privatizing everything in sight. Is this what the American people want? When they are aware of it, the answer is always no. It's the same bullshit re-branded...Ruin the government you are purporting to run and turn it over to privatization frenzy, creating a shadow government of private corporate rule...they will gut government and privatize everything in sight in the name of responding to the crises they helped engineer through Bush and Cheney. Their view of government is the reverse of the Hippocratic Oath: do harm and then when the patient is sick, give the wrong medicine, watch him die, and sell off the body parts.They will destroy the Department of Energy, HUD and anything else they can get their hands on. With this crew, all you need to do is destroy government, privatize it and get out of the way, and then a magic utopia appears. Well, actually it doesn't, but a lot of connected people get rich, and in the privatized war business, blood money flows and a fuck of a lot of innocent people die. The numbers and the misery are staggering. The legacy of Bush/McCain is a legacy of shame. Any man that stood with this criminal administration should be forced to answer for it.The Republicans have been ruinous and most of it stems from an ideology that leaves the government in ruins. McCain has been on board hook, line and sinker. He voted with Bush over 90% of the time. End of story.It is fundamentally corrupt and dishonest to call it reform when leaders want to cripple government, then hand it over to private industry, usually subsidized by taxpayers, but for other people's profits. More like contempt for government.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-cusack/the-final-distraction-mcc_b_126672.html
Author: AntiConformist911
Keywords: Barack Obama Sarah Palin lie john Mccain Joe Biden economy speech interview debate energy oil gas tax Iraq war president
Added: October 6, 2008
An ad style video focusing on Barack Obama's lack of honesty regarding taking money from lobbyists.* * *Im not a Republican — I was a supporter of Ross Perot, and am still a registered member of the Reform Party, the party Perot had helped create. An issue I've cared about is campaign finance reform; I don't believe that anything can be accomplished in government so long as the political system is corrupt.I think it's important for the American people to know that when Barack Obama says that his campaign is somehow different from politics as usual, he isn't being honest.Obama is playing a shell game — he often talks about how he's refusing to take money from lobbyists; what he means by this, specifically, is lobbyists registered for work with the federal government — even so, hes allowed his campaign to continue to take money from lobbyists who, though arent registered with the federal government, are registered with state governments. Those lobbyists, of course, are working for clients that also have interests at the federal level. As you could imagine, the same clients hire other lobbyists who work at that level.Obama has also left open a few other loopholes for getting money from special interest groups: he takes donations from the spouses of lobbyists, from their business partners, and from 'bundlers' — a way around campaign finance laws by representing a single corporate interest as many individual donations.One of the lobbying firms Obamas presidential campaign has associations with boasts on their website that they offer their clients an "enviable level of access" to government officials.Obama also often talks about how his campaign is mostly run through small individual contributions, but thats also not accurate; he has had more money from lobbyists in his coffers than either of his opponents, Senators McCain and Clinton.Obama is not an outsider on a white horse coming in to change how politics is done. He started his political career working in the Chicago Democratic machine, known for its corruption, and won his first election by having the other candidates in the race sued off the ballot."He gets an asterisk that says he is trying to be different. But overall, the same wealthy interests are funding his campaign as are funding other candidates, whether or not they are lobbyists."— Stephen Weissman of the Campaign Finance Institute* * *An asterisk to Obamas policy on donationshttp://articles.latimes.com/2007/apr/22/nation/na-obama22Obama won't accept money from lobbyists... or will he?http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2007/aug/21/Obama-lobby/PACs and lobbyists aided Obama's risehttp://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/08/09/pacs_and_lobbyists_aided_obamas_rise/Big donors are the key to Obama's record haulhttp://www.iht.com/articles/2008/08/05/america/bundlers.php?page=1
Author: sickoftalking
Keywords: Barack Obama Lobbyists Bundlers PACs Corruption
Added: October 5, 2008
Unite behind the MONETARY REFORM ACT!http://www.themoneymasters.com/mra.htmInstead of quarreling over matters of no importance, unite behind a common goal to defeat the destroyers of America!Flood Congress with mail and calls. Spam the internet.There is very little time left, and the rewards will be greater than we can even imagine in this unfolding age of darkness!We the People!J. P. Morgan:"Capital must protect itself in every way... Debts must be collected and loans and mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible. When through a process of law the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law applied by the central power of leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. This is well known among our principle men now engaged in forming an imperialism of capitalism to govern the world. By dividing the people we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us except as teachers of the common herd."THE TIME IS NOW DEAR FRIENDS, YOU KNOW IT AS WELL AS I DO!Save the UNION, Save the Constitution!Pass the MONETARY REFORM ACT!Terrorism cannot be given into ever again!:_(Please do everything you can, I can't raise awareness on my own...The USA is about to be buried alive, and they are already nailing the coffin.Just do it! Yes, WE can!
Author: divinacomedias
Keywords: simpson raw video: signs autographs near court economic financial crisis federal reserve congress bailout bill foreclosure taxes debt terrorism solution love
Added: October 5, 2008
October 2, 2008, U.S. House of Representatives. Congressman Brad Sherman [D-CA] asks: "But why are we bailing out the Bank of China? Why are we bailing out the Saudi royal family?... The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and by sustaining a panic atmosphere... A few Members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted ``no.''________________________________________Congressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu5ICongressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55lOhYw8LxkCongressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHFUa4SpPBUAlex Jones interviews Brad Shermanhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egXhZMaY26wSherman's Blue Paper on the Bailouthttp://bradsherman.house.gov/081001comprehensive_article.pdf171 Heroes vs 263 Traitorshttp://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-681Paul Craig Roberts: It takes the trouble off the banks and puts it on the taxpayershttp://youtube.com/watch?v=PLbWau3rsag&NR=1________________________________________TRANSCRIPTWe are told in 2009 we are going to pass really good legislation to make sure that this never happens again--corporate governance reform, regulatory reform, we are going to get it done. What is really going to happen? We may write a really good bill in the House, something Wall Street really hates. Then it goes over to the Senate where 41 Senators out of 100 is all it takes to block it. I don't think they will defeat reform legislation in the Senate. They will delay it and then they will dilute it. And by the time it passes, it will be so diluted, Wall Street will drink it down with a smile on its face knowing that no effective reform is really being imposed upon them. So we are not going to see meaningful regulatory reform; although we will pass something and Wall Street will tell you it is a big deal. We will see million-dollar-a-month salaries, or one-and-a-half million or $2 million a month salaries paid to the executives of these firms while they are getting a bailout with our taxpayer money. We are going to see a very large percentage of this money going to buy securities, bad paper, and toxic assets currently in safes in Shanghai, Beijing, London and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We will see all of the power in the hands of the Bush administration and in the hands of a part-time temporary administrator, namely the Secretary of the Treasury. Under this bill, if it passes, we don't really know what is going to happen to the economy. No one knows. The only thing that is certain, two things: Wall Street executives are going to get huge amounts of money and our children and grandchildren are going to get stuck with hundreds of billions of dollars of additional Federal debt. And we as a country, having just done a bad $700 billion program, will not be able to do anything to help homeowners because we won't have the money. We won't be able to bail out local governments because we won't have the money. We won't be able to deal effectively with the real banking-lending crisis because we will have shot our entire wad on a bill that is guaranteed only to do one thing, and that is to help the truly wealthy on Wall Street. My time has expired, and I look forward to the Speaker giving unanimous consent to the gentlelady from Ohio controlling the next hour.[ http://www.c-spanarchives.org/congress/?q=node/77531&id=8902076 ]
Author: jaralero
Keywords: brad sherman congress threatened with martial law no bailout fascism usa election 2008 constitution liberty ron paul
Added: October 5, 2008
October 2, 2008, U.S. House of Representatives. Congressman Brad Sherman [D-CA] asks: "But why are we bailing out the Bank of China? Why are we bailing out the Saudi royal family?... The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and by sustaining a panic atmosphere... A few Members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted ``no.''________________________________________Congressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu5ICongressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55lOhYw8LxkCongressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHFUa4SpPBUAlex Jones interviews Brad Shermanhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egXhZMaY26wSherman's Blue Paper on the Bailouthttp://bradsherman.house.gov/081001comprehensive_article.pdf171 Heroes vs 263 Traitorshttp://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-681Paul Craig Roberts: It takes the trouble off the banks and puts it on the taxpayershttp://youtube.com/watch?v=PLbWau3rsag&NR=1________________________________________TRANSCRIPTWe are told in 2009 we are going to pass really good legislation to make sure that this never happens again--corporate governance reform, regulatory reform, we are going to get it done. What is really going to happen? We may write a really good bill in the House, something Wall Street really hates. Then it goes over to the Senate where 41 Senators out of 100 is all it takes to block it. I don't think they will defeat reform legislation in the Senate. They will delay it and then they will dilute it. And by the time it passes, it will be so diluted, Wall Street will drink it down with a smile on its face knowing that no effective reform is really being imposed upon them. So we are not going to see meaningful regulatory reform; although we will pass something and Wall Street will tell you it is a big deal. We will see million-dollar-a-month salaries, or one-and-a-half million or $2 million a month salaries paid to the executives of these firms while they are getting a bailout with our taxpayer money. We are going to see a very large percentage of this money going to buy securities, bad paper, and toxic assets currently in safes in Shanghai, Beijing, London and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We will see all of the power in the hands of the Bush administration and in the hands of a part-time temporary administrator, namely the Secretary of the Treasury. Under this bill, if it passes, we don't really know what is going to happen to the economy. No one knows. The only thing that is certain, two things: Wall Street executives are going to get huge amounts of money and our children and grandchildren are going to get stuck with hundreds of billions of dollars of additional Federal debt. And we as a country, having just done a bad $700 billion program, will not be able to do anything to help homeowners because we won't have the money. We won't be able to bail out local governments because we won't have the money. We won't be able to deal effectively with the real banking-lending crisis because we will have shot our entire wad on a bill that is guaranteed only to do one thing, and that is to help the truly wealthy on Wall Street. My time has expired, and I look forward to the Speaker giving unanimous consent to the gentlelady from Ohio controlling the next hour.[ http://www.c-spanarchives.org/congress/?q=node/77531&id=8902076 ]
Author: jaralero
Keywords: brad sherman congress threatened with martial law no bailout fascism usa election 2008 constitution liberty ron paul
Added: October 5, 2008
October 2, 2008, U.S. House of Representatives. Congressman Brad Sherman [D-CA] asks: "But why are we bailing out the Bank of China? Why are we bailing out the Saudi royal family?... The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and by sustaining a panic atmosphere... A few Members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted ``no.''________________________________________Congressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu5ICongressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55lOhYw8LxkCongressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHFUa4SpPBUAlex Jones interviews Brad Shermanhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egXhZMaY26wSherman's Blue Paper on the Bailouthttp://bradsherman.house.gov/081001comprehensive_article.pdf171 Heroes vs 263 Traitorshttp://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-681Paul Craig Roberts: It takes the trouble off the banks and puts it on the taxpayershttp://youtube.com/watch?v=PLbWau3rsag&NR=1________________________________________TRANSCRIPTWe are told in 2009 we are going to pass really good legislation to make sure that this never happens again--corporate governance reform, regulatory reform, we are going to get it done. What is really going to happen? We may write a really good bill in the House, something Wall Street really hates. Then it goes over to the Senate where 41 Senators out of 100 is all it takes to block it. I don't think they will defeat reform legislation in the Senate. They will delay it and then they will dilute it. And by the time it passes, it will be so diluted, Wall Street will drink it down with a smile on its face knowing that no effective reform is really being imposed upon them. So we are not going to see meaningful regulatory reform; although we will pass something and Wall Street will tell you it is a big deal. We will see million-dollar-a-month salaries, or one-and-a-half million or $2 million a month salaries paid to the executives of these firms while they are getting a bailout with our taxpayer money. We are going to see a very large percentage of this money going to buy securities, bad paper, and toxic assets currently in safes in Shanghai, Beijing, London and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We will see all of the power in the hands of the Bush administration and in the hands of a part-time temporary administrator, namely the Secretary of the Treasury. Under this bill, if it passes, we don't really know what is going to happen to the economy. No one knows. The only thing that is certain, two things: Wall Street executives are going to get huge amounts of money and our children and grandchildren are going to get stuck with hundreds of billions of dollars of additional Federal debt. And we as a country, having just done a bad $700 billion program, will not be able to do anything to help homeowners because we won't have the money. We won't be able to bail out local governments because we won't have the money. We won't be able to deal effectively with the real banking-lending crisis because we will have shot our entire wad on a bill that is guaranteed only to do one thing, and that is to help the truly wealthy on Wall Street. My time has expired, and I look forward to the Speaker giving unanimous consent to the gentlelady from Ohio controlling the next hour.[ http://www.c-spanarchives.org/congress/?q=node/77531&id=8902076 ]
Author: jaralero
Keywords: brad sherman congress threatened with martial law no bailout fascism usa election 2008 constitution liberty ron paul
Added: October 5, 2008
October 2, 2008, U.S. House of Representatives. Congressman Brad Sherman [D-CA] asks: "But why are we bailing out the Bank of China? Why are we bailing out the Saudi royal family?... The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and by sustaining a panic atmosphere... A few Members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted ``no.''________________________________________Congressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu5ICongressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55lOhYw8LxkCongressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHFUa4SpPBUAlex Jones interviews Brad Shermanhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egXhZMaY26wSherman's Blue Paper on the Bailouthttp://bradsherman.house.gov/081001comprehensive_article.pdf171 Heroes vs 263 Traitorshttp://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-681Paul Craig Roberts: It takes the trouble off the banks and puts it on the taxpayershttp://youtube.com/watch?v=PLbWau3rsag&NR=1________________________________________TRANSCRIPTWe are told in 2009 we are going to pass really good legislation to make sure that this never happens again--corporate governance reform, regulatory reform, we are going to get it done. What is really going to happen? We may write a really good bill in the House, something Wall Street really hates. Then it goes over to the Senate where 41 Senators out of 100 is all it takes to block it. I don't think they will defeat reform legislation in the Senate. They will delay it and then they will dilute it. And by the time it passes, it will be so diluted, Wall Street will drink it down with a smile on its face knowing that no effective reform is really being imposed upon them. So we are not going to see meaningful regulatory reform; although we will pass something and Wall Street will tell you it is a big deal. We will see million-dollar-a-month salaries, or one-and-a-half million or $2 million a month salaries paid to the executives of these firms while they are getting a bailout with our taxpayer money. We are going to see a very large percentage of this money going to buy securities, bad paper, and toxic assets currently in safes in Shanghai, Beijing, London and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We will see all of the power in the hands of the Bush administration and in the hands of a part-time temporary administrator, namely the Secretary of the Treasury. Under this bill, if it passes, we don't really know what is going to happen to the economy. No one knows. The only thing that is certain, two things: Wall Street executives are going to get huge amounts of money and our children and grandchildren are going to get stuck with hundreds of billions of dollars of additional Federal debt. And we as a country, having just done a bad $700 billion program, will not be able to do anything to help homeowners because we won't have the money. We won't be able to bail out local governments because we won't have the money. We won't be able to deal effectively with the real banking-lending crisis because we will have shot our entire wad on a bill that is guaranteed only to do one thing, and that is to help the truly wealthy on Wall Street. My time has expired, and I look forward to the Speaker giving unanimous consent to the gentlelady from Ohio controlling the next hour.[ http://www.c-spanarchives.org/congress/?q=node/77531&id=8902076 ]
Author: jaralero
Keywords: brad sherman congress threatened with martial law no bailout fascism usa election 2008 constitution liberty ron paul
Added: October 5, 2008
Flickr (photos about Währungsreform.)
Digg (news relevants about Währungsreform.)